It is difficult to imagine that how a legislator said such ill-logical reason. (However I always find mental disorderd legislator on TV or Newspaper) If rail is completed, there is more pollution?? Then in other words, there is no pollution is there is no new railway?? No matter rail station is put at West Kowloon or "KamShanLo" or simple old connected KCR railway to Guangzhou, Hong Kong citizen have to travel to station by means of transportation. How come the reject reason is more pollution bring to West Kowloon.
參考來源:
參考來源:
"Andrew Cheng Kar-foo, a legislator with the Democratic Party, said he would vote against the plan because of its potential impact on the environment. “After the rail link is completed, buses, taxis and minibuses frequently travelling to the terminus will create more pollution in West Kowloon Cultural District,” Cheng said at the Legco meeting."
- Hong Kong News Headlines | Hong Kong's premier newspaper online | SCMP.com (在「Google 網頁註解」中檢視)
沒有留言:
張貼留言